Performance of the public health care sector in the Republic of Macedonia

Lolita Mitevska, Manuela Sofia Stanculescu, Elisaveta Stikova


Aim: Healthcare authorities constantly search for new approaches of assessing the performance of the health sector. Comparative studies help for improvements in healthcare by learning from each-other. Our aim was to assess the performance of the public healthcare system in the Republic of Macedonia, through the analysis of preparedness of institutions to fulfill the population’s healthcare needs and expectations.

Methods: This study had a regional character. The national research team interviewed 175 randomly selected participants from Macedonia. The research was performed in the period March 2012 – March 2013. For the research purposes there were used especially designed questionnaires for cancer, stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus and injuries. For assessment of the performances, the appropriate techniques were developed.

Results: Macedonians consider public healthcare system as being medium-good in all aspects: accessibility, availability, quality of health care services and population’s confidence. The knowledgeable observers (N=125) believe that state-of-the-art treatment exist all over the country (“yes”: 33.6% and “rather yes”: 44.8%). They believe that the services are accessible to everybody, free of major charges (“yes”: 31.2% and “rather yes”: 45.6%). The individual witnesses (N=50) argued toward lack of pharmacies and proper medicines in rural areas, with a gap between the availability and quality of services in rural vs. urban areas.

Conclusion: The future goals for Macedonia include better public healthcare financing, cost definition of health packages, improved disease prevention and effective human resources.


Assessment of services, availability, public healthcare system, quality of care.

Full Text:


Cite this article


Freeman T. Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature. Health Serv Manage Res 2002;15:126-13.

Contencin P, Falcoff H, Doumenc M. Review of performance assessment and improvement in ambulatory medical care. Health Policy 2006;77:64-75.

Grol R, Baker R, Wensing M, Jacobs A. Quality assurance in general practice: the state of the art in Europe. Fam Pract 1994;11:460-7.

World Health Organization (WHO). 2008-2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategyfor the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva, Switzerland; 2008. (accessed: April 10, 2016).

Ckaleska D, et al. Ambulatory and dispensary morbidity in Macedonia, Institute of Public Health; 2011. (accessed: April 12, 2016).

Kjosevska E, et al. Analysis of hospital morbidity in the Republic of Macedonia 2012-2103, Institute of Public Health, 2011, (accessed: April 10, 2016).

Ministry of Health. Law for Health protection, Official Gazette No 26/2012, (accessed: March 30, 2013).

Ministry of Health, Law for Health protection,Official Gazette N.4/2013 page 84.

Institute of Public Health, Health map in R. Macedonia for the year 2012, (accessed: September 5, 2015).

Wismar M, Palm W, Figueras J, Ernst K, Van Ginneken E. Cross-border health care in the European Union: mapping and analysing practices and policies. Cross-border health care in the European Union: mapping and analysing practices and policies; 2011.

Hofstede G. Motivation, Leadership, and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Abroad? Organizational Dynamics, AMA/AMACOM; 1980.

WHO, HFA indicators. (accessed: November 18, 2015).

Ministry of Health. Strategic plan 2012-2014. (accessed: April 12, 2016).

Health grouper. Patients experiences-How to be better? (accessed: April 12, 2016).

Stanculescu MS, Neculau G. The Performance of Public Health-care Systems in South East Europe, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Belgrade; 2014.

Stanculescu MS. Analysis of the financial literacy survey in Romania and recommendation. Comprehensive report prepared for World Bank. Institute for the study of the quality of life. Bucharest; 2010.

Murray CJ, Evans D. Health systems performance assessment. Office of Health Economics; 2006.

DOI: 10.4119/UNIBI/SEEJPH-2016-104

Copyright (c) 2016 Lolita Mitevska, Manuela Sofia Stanculescu, Elisaveta Stikova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.