Global health in transition: The coming of neoliberalism

Egil Marstein, Suzanne M. Babich

Abstract

 

Global health as a transnational, intergovernmental, value-based initiative led by the World Health Organization (WHO), working toward improving health and achieving equity in health for all people worldwide, has for years yielded to a growing reliance on corporate-led solutions. Private organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGO), religious and other philanthropic and charitable organizations, increasingly serve a dominant role in setting the global health agenda. Short-term success in combating epidemics and in the provision of funding for project-based initiatives appeals to supporters of marketization of health services. For 30 years, a neoliberal paradigm has dominated the international political economy and hence the governance of global health. A utilitarian logic or the ethics of consequentialism have attained prominence under such banners as effective altruism or venture philanthropy.  This contrasts with the merits and relevance of deontological ethics in which rules and moral duty are central. This paper seeks to explain how neo-liberalism became a governing precept and paradigm for global health governance. A priority is to unmask terms and precepts serving as ethos or moral character for corporate actions that benefit vested stakeholders.

 

 

Keywords

global health governance, global health leadership, neoliberalism.

Full Text:

PDF

Cite this article

References

Glasas RI. Americas Vital Interest in Global Health. Perspectives from the Fogarty International Center. Institute of Medicine; 24 March, 2008.

Adams B, Martens J. Fit for whose purpose? Private funding and corporate influence in the United Nations. Global Policy Forum/Global Policy Watch; 27 July, 2015.

Kopland JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, Reddy KS, Rodriguez MH, Sewankambo NK et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet 2009;9679:1993-5.

Williams JM. From humanitarian exceptionalism to contingent care: Care and enforcement at the humanitarian border. Political Geography, 2015;47:11-20.

Brown BS. Humanitarian Intervention at a Crossroad. William & Mary Law Review 2000;41(5/6).

Singer. P. Practical Ethics (3rd ed.) Melbourne: Cambridge University Press; 2011.

Beaglehole R, Bonita R. What is global health? Global Health Action 2010;3.

Mcinnes C, Lee K. Global Health and International Relations. John Wiley & Sons; 2012.

Delanty G. Habermas and Occidental Rationalism: The Politics of Identity, Social Learning, and the Cultural Limits of Moral Universalism. Sociological Theory 1997;15:30-59.

Nichter M. Global Health: Why Cultural Perceptions, Social Representations, and Biopolitics Matter. Human Ecology 2009;37:669-70.

The Institute of Medicine, Board on International Health. Americas Vital Interest in Global Health. Protecting Our People, Enhancing Our Economy, and Advancing Our International Interests; 1997.

Kay A. Williams OD (ed.). Global Health Governance: Crisis, Institutions and Political Economy. Palgrave McMillan, UK; 2009.

McInnes CJ, Lee, K. Global Health & International Relations, Cambridge; Polity Press; 2012.

Rosanvallon P. The Society of Equals, Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press; 2013.

People’s Health Movement. Global Health Watch # 4. Alternative Health Report. London: ZED Books; 2014 (p. 96).

Harvey D. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.


DOI: 10.4119/UNIBI/SEEJPH-2017-179

Copyright (c) 2018 Egil Marstein, Suzanne M. Babich

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.