Impact of Media Trial on Rights of Accused and Victim

Abstract

Media trials, characterized by extensive and often sensationalized reporting of legal cases, have become a contentious issue in the intersection of media and justice. While the media plays a critical role in promoting transparency and holding institutions accountable, its overreach can jeopardize the fundamental rights of both the accused and victims. For the accused, media trials frequently undermine the presumption of innocence, stigmatizing individuals before due process is complete and influencing public perception and judicial outcomes. Similarly, victims often face violations of their privacy and dignity, particularly in sensitive cases, as sensationalism takes precedence over ethical reporting.
This paper examines the legal and ethical dimensions of media trials, focusing on their impact on the right to a fair trial, the right to privacy, and the larger implications for judicial independence. Drawing from constitutional principles, judicial precedents, and case studies, it highlights the need to balance freedom of the press with the rights of those involved in judicial processes. The analysis underscores the urgency for regulatory frameworks and journalistic accountability to mitigate the adverse effects of media trials while preserving their constructive role in fostering justice and public awareness.