Evaluation of an implementation strategy for a World Health Organization (WHO) public health report: The implementation of the International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury (IPSCI) in Romania

Per M. von Groote, Dimitrios Skempes, Jerome E. Bickenbach

Abstract

Aim: This paper aims to evaluate a strategy for the implementation of public health policy recommendations from the World Health Organization’s (WHO) report “International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury” in Romania. More specifically, it seeks to: a) evaluate implementation actions with a focus on a number of people reached and status of completion at 12 months follow-up; b) describe implementation activities undertaken in the course of one year, and; c) evaluate perceived barriers and facilitators of implementation at 12 months follow-up.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was adopted with two surveys administered in 2014/15 among key implementers in Romania. The questionnaires contained open-ended, multiple choice and 5-point Likert scale questions. Results on the implementation status, implementation activities performed and self-reported barriers and facilitators were analysed and reported using descriptive statistics.

Results: Implementation completion rate was 75%, with 4390 persons directly or indirectly benefiting from the implementation-related activities listed in the final implementation plan reporting. A broad range of implementation experiences was reported. Most common activity types were delivery of services, technical trainings, implementation coordination and development meetings. Most useful tools and processes were the Romanian language version summary of the report, educational meetings, and local consensuses processes. Reported outcomes included the direct output produced, evidence of services provided, and individual or organizational level impact. Most barriers were named for the policymakers and academia as stakeholder groups and most facilitating influences for the private sector, with dependence of policymakers on constituency interest scoring highest barrier and the general availability of European Commission and European Structural Funds highest facilitator.

Conclusion: The surveys proved to be both feasible and useful tools to expand our understanding of implementation and to supplement the more standard used implementation strategies at country level.

 

 

Keywords

implementation, implementation strategy, public health report, spinal cord injury, World Health Organization.

Full Text:

PDF

Cite this article

References

World Health Organization, International Spinal Cord Society. International perspectives on spinal cord injury. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, Graves DE, Jha A, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med 2011;34:535-46.

Weerts E, Wyndaele JJ. Accessibility to spinal cord injury care worldwide, the need for poverty reduction. Spinal Cord 2011;49:767.

Post MW, van Leeuwen CM. Psychosocial issues in spinal cord injury, a review. Spinal Cord 2012;50:382-9.

von Groote PM, Shakespeare T, Officer A. Prevention of spinal cord injury. Inj Prev 2014;20:72.

Biering-Sorensen F, Brown DJ, Officer A, Shakespeare T, von Groote P, Wyndaele JJ. IPSCI, a WHO and ISCoS collaboration report. Spinal Cord 2014;52:87.

United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, Resolution 61/106. New York, NY: United Nations; 2006.

World Health Organization, World Bank. World Report on Disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011.

Priestley M. In search of European disability policy, between national and global. ALTER 2007;1:61-74.

World Health Organization, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Implementation research in health, a practical guide. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis JL, Tremblay É. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas, a narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010;88:444-83.

Winter S. Implementation, Introduction. In: Peters J, Pierre BG, editors. Handbook of public administration. London: Sage; 2003:205-11.

Ettelt S, Mays N, Nolte E. Policy learning from abroad, why it is more difficult than it seems. Policy & Politics 2012;40:491-504.

World Health Organization - Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Geneva, Switzerland.http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/en/(accessed: March 6, 2017).

World Health Organization, Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research. Investing in knowledge for resilient health systems, strategic plan 2016-2020. Geneva: WHO; 2016.

von Groote PM, Giustini A, Bickenbach JE. Analysis and implementation of a World Health Organization health report, methodological concepts and strategies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2014;93:S12-S26.

Zhang Y, Wildemuth B. Qualitative analysis of content. In: Wildemuth B, editor. Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press; 2009:308-19.

Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis, An expanded sourcebook. Beverly Hills, California: SAGE; 1995.

Lavis JN, Boyko JA, Gauvin F-P. Evaluating deliberative dialogues focussed on healthy public policy. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1.

Moat KA, Lavis JN, Clancy SJ, El-Jardali F, Pantoja T. Evidence briefs and deliberative dialogues, perceptions and intentions to act on what was learnt. Bull World Health Organ 2014;92:20-8.

Boyko J, Lavis J, Dobbins M. Deliberative dialogues as a strategy for system-level knowledge translation and exchange. Healthcare Policy 2014;9:122-31.

Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Matthieu MM, Damschroder LJ, Chinman MJ, Smith JL, et al. Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance, results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Implement Sci 2015;10:1.

MacLachlan M, Amin M, Mji G, Mannan H, McVeigh J, McAuliffe E, et al. Learning from doing the EquitAble project, content, context, process, and impact of a multi-country research project on vulnerable populations in Africa. Afr J Dis 2014;3:1-12.

Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations, systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q 2004;82:581-629.

Newman J, Cherney A, Head BW. Policy Capacity And Evidence-Based Policy In The Public Service. Public Management Review 2016:1-20.

World Health Organization (WHO). A guide to implementation research in the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: WHO, 2016.

Hupe P. What happens on the ground, persistent issues in implementation research. Publ Pol Adm 2014;29:164-82.

Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Lavis JN, Lewin S. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 18, planning monitoring and evaluation of policies. Health Res Policy Syst 2009;7:S1-S18.

Oxman AD, Bjorndal A, Becerra-Posada F, Gibson M, Block MA, Haines A, et al. A framework for mandatory impact evaluation to ensure well informed public policy decisions. Lancet 2010;375:427-31.

Blanchet K, James P. How to do (or not to do), a social network analysis in health systems research. Health Policy Plan 2012;27:438-46.


DOI: 10.4119/UNIBI/SEEJPH-2017-151

Copyright (c) 2017 Per M. von Groote, Dimitrios Skempes, Jerome E. Bickenbach

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.